Friday, June 16, 2006

We are in denial

(A write up by Sri Sri - it seems to apply very much to me right now)

Negating identity causes inaction, sloth and lethargy


SRI SRI RAVI SHANKAR

If you come across a Communist, with a Hindu name, and ask him about his
identity, he will deny being a Hindu. Yet, a Muslim Communist often claims
his identity without hesitation. One wonders what causes this difference in
attitude.

It is interesting to probe into the psyche of identity, which often is a
source of security, insecurity, conflict and comfort. Perhaps the following
reasons would answer the identity crises of the Hindus. The broadmindedness
of Hinduism, its inherent inclusiveness and secularism, makes Hindus feel
guilty about claiming their identity, as it is embedded in their philosophy
that it is wrong to exclude others. Claiming a religious identity makes them
feel they are excluding others and so they shy away from doing so.



Hindus have been traditionally groomed by the Vedanta to drop all
identities. This has deeply influenced the Hindu psyche. Hindu philosophy is
woven around egolessness. Let alone their religion, some sadhus don’t even
say their name; they would say, “What’s in a name?” Sanyasis are even shy to
talk about their parentage. A renowned ascetic in Rishikesh would meet with
everybody, but not his own mother and family. When asked, he would say, “I
am Vedanti; once I have taken sanyasa, I have dropped all my identities.”

This is an erroneous understanding of Vedanta. Why do we fear the identity
so much? Seeing identity as stumbling blocks for one’s growth is ignorance.
Sanyasa is transcending identity; it is being in that centredness from where
you have equal love and compassion for all. It is the unshakable light and
richness that one has found in one’s Being which is universal. Transcending
identity is different from denying identity. When religious leaders
themselves denounce their identity, the community follows suit. This is akin
to the thought that secularism is anti-religion.

Caste identity is in some places much stronger than religious identity. The
normal tendency is to go for one single identity than for a dual one. So,
between caste and religion, many Hindus seem to go for caste. Hindus feel
ashamed of the ills of Hinduism — its superstition, untouchability, and
practices like sati are usually highlighted in the media, rather than its
unparalleled philosophy and scientific temperament. Thus, for several
centuries Hindu bashing has been a fashion.

The media seems to have given the prerogative of Hindu identity to the RSS
and VHP and secular-minded Hindus would not like to associate with these two
organisations. As a result they shy away from their own identity.

Within India itself, we witness a great deal of ignorance about the Hindu
religion and its scriptures. Although Hindus form 80 per cent population of
India, there is still only one university which teaches Hinduism — whereas
there are five which teach Islam, five which teach Christianity, two which
teach Sikhism and one that teaches Jainism. You would find every Muslim
would know a couple of verses from the Quran; you can hardly find a
Christian who has not read the Bible.

But Hindus who know Sanskrit or a few shlokas are rare. Most educated Hindus
know the Bible; they know Christmas carols. When they know nothing about
their religion, how can they take pride in it?

There are 1.25 billion Hindus in the world, a little over one-sixth of the
world’s population, but you hardly find a single Hindu lobby at
international forums. You will find a Christian lobby, a Muslim lobby or a
Jewish lobby, but you can’t find a Hindu lobby. Just 12 million Jews in the
world are such a powerful voice. Buddhists also have a voice and make their
presence felt at world forums.

In countries of south and central America and in Europe, although they are
secular democracies, they are not shy to proclaim their allegiance to
Christianity. You will find the religious symbol of the Cross placed in
their parliaments; chaplains offer prayer before every official dinner.
While associations like YMCA (Young Men’s Christian Association) have gained
wide acceptance. Why then is it that Hindu associations are viewed with
scepticism?

A strong community is an asset to any nation. A weak community will always
be in fear and because of insecurity will become aggressive. It is the pride
in one’s identity which strengthens the community. Identity is in no way
contradictory to universality.

People often ask, “Will not the concept of global family, Vasudhaiva
Kutambakam, contradict patriotism? Similarly, will your religious identity
not conflict with your universality?’’ The answer is “No”. Your duty as a
family man is not a hindrance for your realisation that you are Brahman. You
don’t need to run away to the forest to realise “All this is Brahman”. Your
being spiritual in no way contradicts your being a socially responsible
citizen. In fact, it enhances your ability to care and share.

The conflict in the world is because people are either stuck in their
identity, and die for it, or shy away from their identity and lose their
roots. One has to opt for a middle path. The ideal situation will be when
every religion transcends its identity. Until that time, it is unwise for
the Hindus to let go of their identity. We cannot, and should not, eliminate
differences on this planet. We need to celebrate the differences. And this
is the uniqueness of Bharat — from the atheism of Charvaka to Bhakthi Panth
and Sufism, it’s one beautiful bouquet.

An identity is related to an action. Denial of identity will dump you in
inaction, sloth and lethargy and hence Krishna reminds Arjuna of his
Kshatriya identity even while giving “Brahma gyan” to remind him of his
duties and responsibilities. Otherwise while giving this High knowledge of
the Self, why would Krishna remind him again and again of his limited
identity. The limited identity in no way contradicts the universal one. A
policeman cannot perform his duties — steer the traffic — if he fails to
acknowledge his identity. Similarly, if a businessman shies away from his
identity, he cannot function. The same is the story of Hindu identity. India
cannot make a distinct mark on the world if it ignores its religious and
spiritual heritage.




More information about the Ornet mailing list

1 comment:

-B said...

This really makes a lot of sense, especially when we have an eon of hindu history to retrospect.

I am proud to be a part of highly spirtual hindu religion.. :-)